Water Efficiency Database

Welcome to our resources search page. Please use the drop down menu to find recent Waterwise research and reports. This website also hosts the Water Efficiency Evidence Database, which is a repository of key research reports and paid for by UK water companies to support research and innovation.


Search Resources

Lydd Retrofit Trial Report (DRAFT) (2012)

This report analyses a water-efficiency retrofit trial from 2009, which Veolia Water South East carried out as part of its metering trial activities and compulsory metering programme in the town of Lydd. Its main goal was to understand customer’s perceptions around various aspects of implementing retrofit programmes through four focus groups. 1,450 households were invited by phone call, of which participated 250 in the trial. 43 % of the 163 successfully interviewed post-trial indicated having had a positive experience with the water-saving devices. The majority believed water savings were low and that they reduced their bill “a little”, £4.26 on average.

For the full article click here.

Water Sector Report Climate Change Risk Assessment (2012)

The purpose of the first Climate Change Risk Assessment (CCRA) was to assess the key risks and opportunities facing the UK from climate change to the year 2100. The CCRA is required by the Climate Change Act 2008 and will be completed every five years. This Water Sector Report is one of 11 Sector Reports and is a key step in the process of developing the evidence base for the CCRA. The analysis described in this report covers three themes: pressures on water availability, water quality, and the deterioration of water company assets.

For the full article click here.

United Utilities Home Audit Project

This report brings together findings from a trial carried out by United Utilities in 2006-2007 that investigated the effectiveness of water-efficient devices. 4,642 domestic properties in Warrington were sent an invitation. 393 took part in the audit and received a ‘water savers pack’, which included a basic shower timer and information on saving water. Further devices were installed where appropriate including water efficient showerheads, dual flush retrofit and save-a-flush cistern displacement devices. 67 % of 211 measured households were able to save water, on average 20.6 litres per property per day, which represents a reduction in water use of 6.8%.

For the full article click here.

Freshwater Availability and Use in the UK (2011)

The study identifies those industrial and commercial sectors and regions of the UK where water use is high, where there is scope for significant reductions in water use and where environmental pressures on water use are greatest. This study sought to complete a water mass balance for each region and sector in order that non-household sectors that are major consumers of water could be identified. All types of observations through CAMS (Catchment Abstraction Management Strategies), WEI (Water Exploitation Index) and other water stress indicators show that much of south-east England and East Anglia is currently, and will continue to be the most water-stressed area of the UK, although there are a number of very localised areas elsewhere which are already over-abstracted. These have been identified as short term priority locations.

For the full article click here.

Response to Welsh Assembly Government Consultation on Building Resilience to Climate Change (2011)

The consultation identifies productivity gains from more efficient use of water as potential benefit, and Waterwise wholeheartedly supports this - public sector organisations such as schools and hospitals can make significant savings on both their water and energy bills through wasting less in “domestic” processes such as taps, toilets, urinals and showers, as well as in cleaning processes.

For the full article click here.

Waterwise Consultation response for Draft EA drought plans (2011)

Waterwise praises this ambitious Environment Agency drought plan and is optimistic that, if implemented – and in combination with our suggestions – it will deliver an effective management and prevention of droughts while reconciling the interest of the environmental and water demand. Although, Waterwise is concerned whether the Environment Agency has adequate resources to implement such an ambitious plan (especially in the communications), considering the cuts that have taken place within their water resources team.

For the full article click here.

Waterwise Reponse to Consumer Council for Water Consultation on its Draft Forward Work Programme (2011)

Waterwise welcomes the emphasis in the Forward Work programme on the long-term legitimacy and sustainability of the water sector in England and Wales. CCWater’s role to date in providing customer feedback on existing and proposed water company mechanisms and frameworks has been very useful. However, Waterwise would like to see the Consumer Council for Water reach beyond reporting customer views, to taking an even more strategic approach to assessing what is in the interest of customers in the long-run – a clear aim of Ofwat’s regulatory processes.

For the full article click here.

Waterwise Response to BIS Call for Evidence on Principles for Economic Regulation (2011)

Waterwise is very supportive of the Coalition Government’s commitment to setting out principles for economic regulation across sectors. Many of the challenges – for example of climate change and population growth – are common across sectors, but because the regulatory framework for each sector has developed independently, these regulatory frameworks do not currently work together and on occasion work in conflict. This consultation and the resulting policy offers the opportunity to address such issues more strategically and deliver multiple outcomes more cost-effectively.

For the full article click here.

Review of the Water Resources Management Plan Process (2011)

Waterwise respond to Defra's call for a review of the first Water Resource Management Plan Process. Feedback includes a problematic lack of co-ordination between Ofwat's price review process and the WRMP process and a need for more standardised language and metrics.

For the full article click here.

Multi-Organisation Reponse to DECC Consultation on The role of appliances and consumer electronics in the CERT (2011)

This multi-organisation response was coordinated by Waterwise. Signatories to this response agree that CERT has been a useful mechanism to help the UK deliver its carbon emission reduction targets and stay within carbon budgets. It is recommended that the Coalition Government should review the existing function and scope of CERT within the extension period and in particular look at the role of non-insulation measures. We are of the opinion that the current scope of CERT should be maintained during the extension period, but with greater enforcement of existing regulation and amendments which maximise the potential for promoting joint water and energy programmes to ensure cost-effective CERT delivery.

For the full article click here.
1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21